March 31 – 2004

Caspari Center Media Review

 

 

The Passion of the Christ

Approximately 200 articles from all media; Feb. 13 – March 25, 2004

 

By far the most “popular” topic of materials covered in this review is Mel Gibson’s film, The

Passion of the Christ. Predictably, most articles are against the movie, claiming it is anti-Semitic,

and consider it violent sensationalism. Israelis themselves have few opportunities to see The

Passion, as no Israeli distributors have expressed an interest in screening it. Other than East

Jerusalem and Palestinian Authority venues, only the Jerusalem Cinematheque has considered

showing the film, which would be followed by a panel discussion with religious leaders. An

orthodox member of the Jerusalem city council, however, has threatened to cut the

Cinematheque’s funding if they go ahead with the screening.

 

The orthodox daily HaTzofeh (March 23) finds it entertaining that The Dawn of the Dead (a

horror movie) replaced The Passion at the box-office. Shlomo Shamir, writing in The Jerusalem

Post (Feb. 25) warned that seeing the film could weaken the faith of Jews. Numerous other

articles comment on the commercial success of The Passion and related materials: the future of

Jewish-Christian relations; and beliefs about culpability for the death of Jesus (according to an

Anti Defamation League survey quoted in The Jerusalem Post and Ha’Aretz on Feb. 25, 25% of

Americans believe the Jews are to blame).

 

Ma’ariv (March 19, 26) and The Jerusalem Post (March 16) ran profiles of Maia Morgenstern,

the Jewish actress who played Mary in the film. She rejects questions about whether she feels

guilty,” saying that that is a dangerous way to relate to art. She also says that it is clear that the

film is not about blaming the Jews, but is a metaphor for the fact that each person can “turn into

an animal when a helpless, chained person is standing before him.”

 

Four additional articles (Ma’ariv, Ha’Aretz, Yediot Ahronot, March 18; HaTzofeh, March 19,

2004) cover Gibson’s plan to produce a movie about the Maccabean Revolt, quoting him as

saying that “the story of Hanukah is like a Western.”

 

Missionaries and Anti-Missionaries

 

HaModia, March 3, 8, 12, 14, 19; Moreshet Radio, March 9, 21; Sha’a Tova, March 21; Ynet,

Feb. 17; HaTzofeh, Feb. 29, March 19; Yated Ne’eman, March 14; Kol HaZman, March 5:

Ha’Aretz English, Feb. 17, March 5; Reshet Bet, Feb. 23; Iton Tel-Aviv, Feb. 13; Sheva, Feb. 12

 

A number of articles address “problems” in schools. HaModia (March 19, English edition) reports

that Yad L’Achim has demanded that a kibbutz high-school replace Bibles given to the students

by “missionaries,” which contain the New Testament, with “kosher” Bibles donated by Yad

L’Achim. The anti-missionary organization is also warning that there are “missionary pupils” in

orthodox schools, and that the phenomenon is a “plague.” A parent of one of the accused

students stated that he preferred to send his child to a school where he would learn the Bible,

rather than to a secular school. In cooperation with the schools’ administrations, some of these

students are being expelled; Yad L’Achim hopes to “save” others from mixed marriages or those

who are not active believers. (HaTzofeh, March 19: Moreshet Radio, March 21)

 

Another warning is given against lectures about blood transfusions at Soroka hospital in Be’er

Sheva, which were to be taught by Jehovah’s Witnesses. Yad L’Achim uncovered the truth in

time to have the lectures cancelled and send the missionaries packing (Moreshet Radio, March

9: Sha’a Tova, March 21; HaModia, March 3). Another danger, according to the Lev L’Achim

anti-missionary group, is the mystical cult known as “The Center for Kabbala Studies” (Yated

Ne’eman, March 14: HaModia, March 14) Leading rabbis have stated that it is prohibited to even

look at the center’s books on Jewish mysticism, since they could lead the innocent astray. In Tel-

Aviv, the municipal rabbis have accused the “Messianic Jews” of trying to influence minors,

which is illegal; and, with the help of Knesset members and the municipality, are attempting to

shut down their facilities and activities (Iton Tel-Aviv, Feb. 13; Ynet, Feb. 17).

 

In a report on another legal issue (Reshet Bet, Feb. 23), a lawyer is interviewed about the right

of newspapers to reject paid advertisements on ideological grounds. The Jerusalem Post

recently refused to run an ad by a prominent Messianic leader, and the courts upheld their right

to do so because they claimed many of their orthodox readers might be offended and that would

cause the paper financial damage.

 

Israeli Views of Christians

 

Radio Jerusalem, Feb. 4; Channel 2, Feb. 3, 4; Channel 10, Feb. 3, 4; Ha’Aretz, Feb. 24; Yediot

Ahronot, March 22; Mishpaha, March 4, 2004

 

Radio Jerusalem and channels 2 and 10 report on the arrest of two men who took advantage of

Christian charities by pretending to be victims of a terror attack. The attitude of the reports is that

the people involved cynically abused the goodwill-and naivet’-of those trying to help the needy.

 

On the other hand, Rev. Alex Awad, a pastor in East Jerusalem, wrote a letter to Ha’Aretz

asking why Christians are treated as enemies in Israel. In his letter he refers to the difficulties

Christians encounter when applying for visas and other permits, especially when they turn to the

very office that was set up to help them, the Christian department of the Religious Affairs

Ministry.

 

A family from the Philippines is also experiencing visa problems, according to Yediot Ahronot.

The couple and their 3 children love Israel and Judaism, are part of the Bnei Noah community

who live as orthodox Jews, but since they were not converted according to Halakhah (Jewish

law) they are facing jail and/or deportation.

 

Mishpaha carried a 6-page profile of Walid S., a Palestinian former terrorist who is now a pro-

Israel evangelical Christian. He was converted after reading the Bible and lives in the US, but his

dream is to go into prisons and preach the gospel to other Palestinian terrorists.

 

Christian Support for Israel

 

In Jerusalem, March; Ha’‘Aretz English, March 17; HaKibbutz, March 4; The Jerusalem Post,

Feb. 26, 29; Kol-Bi, Feb. 12; Channel 1, Feb. 4; Makor Rishon, March 5; Ha’Aretz, March 16

 

Makor Rishon, a weekly religious paper, ran an article entitled “The Zionist Theology of Van der

Hoeven” under the heading of “Logic in Madness.” The writer notes that Van der Hoeven’s

words sound militant, and quotes him as saying that “the Palestinians are murdering you, and

you’re acting like a battered wife.”

 

Ha’Aretz and television Channel 1 report on a ground swell of European Evangelicals who are

going against the dominant paradigm in their countries by choosing to support Israel. Some of

these visited Israel recently and were interviewed, complaining about the European media’s bias

and the disinterest of most people. They all agreed that what is needed is more and better PR,

so that people will know the truth.

 

In Jerusalem reports on the new “Christian Allies’ Caucus” in the Knesset – the first official

recognition of the Christian pro-Israel movement by the Israeli government. Israeli

parliamentarians will meet periodically with representatives of the Christian community to

discuss various issues such as pro-lsrael PR efforts abroad and charitable works in Israel. There

is some concern, however, that due to the visa hardships experienced by many clergy,

representation of the Christian community will be weighted toward the “better-connected.”

 

Book Review

 

Ha’Aretz, Feb. 20, 27: Ha’Aretz English, Feb. 27, 2004

 

These 3 reviews covered a Hebrew translation of Shekhina, the Virgin Mary and the Song of

Songs: Reflections on a Kabbalistic Symbol in its Christian Context by A.Y. Green. In the book,

Green posits that the female image of the Shekhina in medieval Jewish mysticism is a reaction

to Christian veneration of the Virgin Mary. He draws parallels between the descriptions of the

two, but in the opinion of the reviewer, Yehuda Liebes, these parallels, though interesting and

evocative of the spiritual atmosphere of the time, do not prove his thesis.

 

The book contains a survey of both Jewish and Christian exegesis of the Song of Songs: Jewish

tradition mostly associates the “beloved” with the community of Israel, which in turn is equated

by kabbalists with the Shekhina.

 

Copyright 2004, Caspari Center.

Material reproduced from this site must specify the source

and that the copyright remains with the Caspari Center.